¶1Defendant appeals her conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b), arguing that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress. At oral argument, defendant conceded that her argument depended on our affirming the suppression order in State v. Gloster (A50700), 103 Or App 473, 798 P2d 256 (1990). Because we reverse in that case, this appeal necessarily fails.
¶2Affirmed.