Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 P.3d 249 - State v. Daniels

State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Burks v. United States · Berkemer v. McCarty · Thompson v. Keohane · Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Schoonover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is nonsensical to speak of a criminal act — an assault — that results in death as being part of the res gestae of that same criminal act since the conduct constituting the assault and the homicide are the same. Consequently, in the case of assault there will never be a res gestae issue because the assault will always be directly linked to the homicide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`where an indictment or information contains two or more counts and the jury either convicts or acquits upon one and is silent as to the other, and the record does not show the reason for the discharge of the jury, the accused cannot again be put upon trial as to those counts.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he Davis court also noted that, had something in the record explained why the court discharged the jury, the explanation might allow the State to retry Davis on both counts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.