Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 P.3d 262 - State v. Clarke

State v. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Williams v. People of State of New York · McMillan v. Pennsylvania

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he court shall impose a sentence to a maximum term consisting of the statutory maximum sentence for the offense and a minimum term either within the standard sentence range for the offense, or outside the standard sentence range pursuant to RCW 9.94A.535, if the offender is otherwise eligible for such a sentence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An exceptional sentence upward may be reversed on appeal if (1) under a clearly erroneous standard, the trial court's reasons for imposing the sentence are not supported by the record, (2) those reasons do not justify the exceptional sentence as a matter of law, or (3) under an abuse of discretion standard, the exceptional sentence is clearly too excessive or clearly too lenient.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is akin to Washington's former indeterminate sentencing regime, where the trial court imposed the maximum sentence and the parole board set a minimum sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.