State v. Quattrocchi’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably State v. Cline (1979), State v. Leavitt (1968)
90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dufour · 30 Ill. 2d 400 - The PEOPLE v. Tate · State v. Mendes · State v. Kozukonis · Upham v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * we limit our review in criminal cases to rulings made in the course of a trial to which exceptions have been properly reserved. It is the exception which enables a party to bring upon the record that he has made a legal objection to a ruling; and that exception must relate to a specific ruling or decision. A blanket or a general exception will not suffice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wright“"rr]here are eminent scholars who believe that the earlier statement being closer to the events is superior in trustworthiness and should therefore have substantive value and be considered as proof of the facts which appear therein * * State v. Quattrocchi, 103 R.I. 115, 123 , 235 A.2d 99, 104 (1967) (citing scholarly publications).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Espinal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.