Delestre v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 521 So. 2d 106 - Smith v. State · Hazuri v. State · Hendricks v. State · Frasilus v. State · 91 So. 3d 826 - State v. Barrow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) [the] trial court should not use any language that would mislead a jury into believing read-backs are prohibited, and (2) when a jury requests trial transcripts, the trial judge should deny the request, but inform the jury of the possibility of a read-back.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bannister v. State“[a] jury is composed of laypersons often unfamiliar with legal terms of art,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there should be no magic words required for a read-back request.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.