¶1Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see also Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579, 583 (Fla.2004) (“Under the circumstances of this case, a defendant would be required to allege what testimony defense counsel could have elicited from witnesses and how defense counsel’s failure to call, interview, or present the witnesses who would have so testified prejudiced the case.”).
103 So. 3d 273
Ward v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 26, 2012
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-12-26
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Nelson v. State
Decided 2012-12-26