Gray v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · Ogden Aviation Services v. Dar · Smith v. Smith · 4 So. 3d 778 - Rabbath v. Farid · 672 So. 2d 597 - Crowley v. Crowley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In considering an award of alimony under section 61.08(2), Florida Statutes, the trial court must determine whether either party has an actual need for alimony and whether either party has the ability to pay.alimony, and then examine “all relevant economic factors, including but not limited to” the nine- [now ten] factors identified in the statute and “any other factor necessary to do equity and justice between the parties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“For purposes of alimony awards, courts reviewing imputation of income have applied the same factors as those applied to imputing income for child support.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Frerking v. Stacy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.