103 So. 3d 98 - Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ring v. Arizona · 668 So. 2d 954 - Terry v. State · 732 So. 2d 1065 - Banks v. State · 852 So. 2d 226 - FB v. State · Mansfield v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First the complaining party must establish that the information is relevant and material to jury service in the case. Second that the juror concealed the information during questioning. Lastly, that the failure to disclose the information was not attributable to the complaining party's lack of diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sonneman v. State“its plain and ordinary meaning, giving due regard to the context within which it is used.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“there is substantial competent evidence to support the verdict and judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.