Faris v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tomlinson v. Siehl · McDonald v. United States · Alagia, Day, Trautwein & Smith v. Broadbent · Michels v. Sklavos · Northwestern National Insurance v. Osborne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not a part of the normal progression of litigation, but is an extraordinary procedure whereby a collateral attack is made upon a judgment upon specific grounds set forth in the rule. As such, a CR 60.02 claim is not of the same character as an appeal of right or a motion for discretionary review. It is separate and distinct from the main case, and a party may not use it as a means to extend a statutory period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.