Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

103 S.W.3d 201

State v. Watkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-02-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2012

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-02-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Christopher Watkins appeals his conviction of one count of first degree robbery, RSMo § 569.020, and one count of armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/103/sw3d/201 · .json · Public domain