Middleton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co. · Gomez v. Dade County School Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“He must show “that counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 . To do this, [he] must identify specific acts or omissions of counsel that resulted from unreasonable professional judgment, and the “court must determine whether, in light of all the circumstances, the identified acts or omissions were outside the wide range of professional competent assistance.” Id. at 690 , 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peterson v. State“A prospective juror may be excluded for cause only if the juror's views would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his or her duties as a juror in accordance with the instructions and oath.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Prosecutors must disclose, even without a request, exculpatory evidence, including evidence that may be used to impeach a government witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Parker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.