Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 SW3D 822 - State v. Daniel

State v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Haskins · Missouri Commission on Human Rights v. Red Dragon Restaurant, Inc. · State v. Briggs · State v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a decrease or diminishing or damaging of an action or ability of the body to do that for which it is intended that is something short of permanent but more than of short duration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'Where the statutory language is unambiguous, we need not resort to statutory construction and must give effect to the statute as written.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Whether an injury constitutes protracted impairment depends on the circumstances of each case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.