Dennick v. Railroad Co.’s Empirical Analysis
103 U.S. 11 · 1880
Citation profile
128 federal appellate · 36 district · 161 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 504 later decisions (41 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2018 · most notably Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert (1947), Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad (1912)
128 federal appellate · 36 district · 161 state decisions — followed in 38 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Green v. Van Buskirk · Whitford v. . the Panama Railroad Company · William Mason v. Blaireau · Bissell v. Michigan Southern & Northern Indiana Railroad Companies
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 504 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a civil action to recover damages for .a civil injury.”
19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The advocates or this view interpolate into the statute what is not there. * ⅜ * ¶⅛ statute says the amount recovered shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin. Why not add here, also, by construction, ‘if they reside in the state of New Jersey’? It is obvious that nothing in the language of the statute requires such a construction. Indeed, by inference it is opposed to it. The first section makes the liability of the corporation or person absolute where the death arises from their negligence. Who shall say that it depends on the appointment of an administrator within the state?””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Let it be remembered that this is not a case of an administrator appointed in one state suing in that capacity in the courts of another state, without any authority from the latter. It is the general rule that this cannot be done.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.