Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 U.S. 40 - Bamberger v. Terry

Bamberger v. Terry’s Empirical Analysis

103 U.S. 40 · 1880

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 1934
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1934 · most notably McDonald v. Nebraska (1900), Bowden v. Burnham (1894)

14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

80188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘•By section 954, Revised Statutes, the trial coxxrt may at any time permit either of the parties to amend any defect in the process or pleadings upon such conditions as it shall in its discretion, or by its rules, prescribe. This clearly authorizes the allowance of amendments during the process of a trial in furtherance of justice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.