Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 U.S. 580 - Jarrolt v. Moberly

Jarrolt v. Moberly’s Empirical Analysis

103 U.S. 580 · 1880

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2001 · most notably Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell (1934), Eisner v. Macomber (1920)

3 federal appellate · 23 state decisions — followed in 13 states

1001880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Loan Association v. Topeka · Harshman v. Bates County · State v. Curators State University

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A constitutional provision should not be construed so as to defeat its evident purpose, but rather so as to give it effective operation and suppress the mischief at which it (319) was aimed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The general assembly shall not authorize any county, city, or town to become a stockholder in, or to loan its credit to, any company, association, or corporation, unless two-thirds of the qualified voters of such county, city, or town, at a regular or special election to be held therein, shall assent thereto.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It was the purpose of the constitutional provision to check these abuses, by requiring the previous assent of two-thirds of the qualified voters of the municipal bodies before any more stock should be subscribed by them, or any further indebtedness be thus incurred.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.