Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 U.S. 597 - Swan v. Arthur

Swan v. Arthur’s Empirical Analysis

103 U.S. 597 · 1880

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
May 2013
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2013 · most notably United States v. Stone & Downer Co. (1927), American Net & Twine Co. v. Worthington (1891)

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

16018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “language will be presumed to have the same meaning-in commerce that it has in ordinary use, unless the contrary is shown,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.