State v. Jensen’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2024
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los Angeles · Jolly v. United States · United States Cold Storage Co. v. Central Manufacturing District Bank · People v. Eppinger · People of the State of New York v. . Dowling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That defendant cannot lawfully be tried and convicted on a charge upon which she was not given, or on which she did not waive a preliminary hearing is elemental.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was not given a preliminary hearing for the offense of which she was convicted”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.