Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 VA 838 - Burdett v. Commonwealth

Burdett v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
12
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Van Dyke v. Superior Court (1922), Coons v. State (1922)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 12 states

50190419101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry · State ex inf. Crow v. Shepherd · Cartwright's Case · State v. Morrill · State v. Frew & Hart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he substantial difference between a direct and a constructive contempt is one of procedure. Where the contempt is committed in the presence of the court, it is competent for it to proceed upon its own knowledge of the facts, ‘and to punish the offender without further proof, and without issue or trial in any form.’ (Citations omitted.) “In dealing with indirect contempts—that is, such as are committed not in the presence of the court—the offender must be brought before the court by a rule or some other sufficient process; but the power of the court to punish is the same in both cases.” 103 Va. at 845-46 , 48 S.E. at 880-81 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In the 9 Cyc. of Law and Procedure, p. 6, a constructive contempt is stated to be “an act done not in the presence of the court, but at a distance, which tends to belittle, to degrade, or to obstruct, interrupt, prevent, or embarrass the administration of justice.” Barton, in Vol. 2 (2 Ed.), p. 774, of his Law Practice, is to the same effect. “Contempt of court is a disobedience to the court, or an opposing or despising the authority, justice or dignity thereof.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.