Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Wash. 2d 636 - State v. Smissaert

103 Wash. 2d 636 - State v. Smissaert’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
3
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 108 Wash. 2d 125 - State v. Pascal (1987), 116 Wash. 2d 30 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Moore (1991)

34 state decisions

13019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Sealy, Inc. · Rosenberg v. United States · Railway Employes' Department v. Hanson · Phillips v. Phillips · Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant further contends that remanding this case to the trial court for resentencing after he has already commenced serving his term of imprisonment would result in an increase in his sentence constituting double jeopardy. We find this contention to be without merit. We are not remanding this case to the trial court for the purpose of increasing a valid sentence, but rather we are sending the defendant back for the correction of an erroneous and invalid sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A retroactive entry is proper only to rectify the record as to acts which did occur, not as to acts which should have occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.