Firth v. Lu’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman · 121 Wash. 2d 715 - Kruse v. Hemp · 62 Wash. 2d 645 - State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. Martin · 94 Wash. 2d 255 - Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc. · Weden v. San Juan County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiffs finding the defendants Hefu Lu and Qian Sun to have breached the agreement to convey their interests associated with apartment 2 in Maryland Apts., Inc. and for specific performance directing Hefu Lu and Qian Sun to perform as provided for under the agreement to purchase dated April 18, 1997 upon the tendering of purchase price by Donald Firth and Barbara Palecek to occur within 60 days of the entry of judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Firth v. Lu“Barbara A. Palecek and Donald R. Firth agree to purchase Apartment 2 (626 13th Avenue East) from Hefu (Max) Lu and Qian (Jeanette) Sun for $180,000. Possession to take place on October 15, 1997 after exchange of remainder of purchase price and receipt of stock certificate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Firth v. Lu“right to a proprietary lease for the apartment associated with the block of shares owned by each shareholder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Firth v. Lu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.