Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 WASHAPP 693 - State v. Rodriguez

State v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Illinois v. Allen · Luce v. United States · Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Schoonover · 125 Wash. 2d 24 - State v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Id. However, the context of the Hartzog case was loss of defense witness credibility and resulting prejudice to the defendant. As the trial court suggested, in that context, the Hartzog court concluded restraints for witnesses should be imposed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Normally people object to that because they say it gives them a bad image and people won't believe them or have less credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] traditional jail uniform with stripes across it, [a] cartoon character of what a prison uniform looks like[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.