Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Wash. App. 800 - State v. Thomas

103 Wash. App. 800 - State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thorne · State v. Broadaway · 62 Wash. 2d 645 - State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. Martin · Amalgamated Transit v. State · 35 Wash. 2d 1 - Gruen v. State Tax Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “AN ACT Relating to insurance fraud; amending RCW 48.01.030, 48.18.460, 48.30.210, 48.30.220, 48.50.010, 48.50.020, 48.50.030, 48.50.040, 48.50.075, 48.80.020, 2.48.180, 9.12.010, 9A.72.010, 9A.72.030, 9A.76.020, 9A.82.010, and 18.130.190; reenacting and amending RCW 9.94A.320; adding a new section to chapter 42.17 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 9A.68 RCW; adding a new section to chapter 9A.76 RCW; adding a new chapter to Title 48 RCW; creating a new section; repealing RCW 9.91.090, 9A.82.903, 48.50.060, 48.50.080, and 49.44.070; prescribing penalties; providing an effective date; and declaring an emergency.[ [13] ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[22] the Act also had the effect of continuing to criminalize criminal profiteering based upon any one of the other numerous crimes included within the definition. These underlying felonies encompass an array of criminal conduct including murder, theft, child buying, money laundering, promoting pornography, or delivery or possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance—the crime charged in the instant case. The crime of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) A person commits the offense of leading organized crime by: (a) intentionally organizing, managing, directing, supervising, or financing any three or more persons with the intent to engage in a pattern of criminal profiteering activity[.] [11] The termination provision provided in part: The following acts or parts of acts as they now exist or are hereafter amended are each repealed effective July 1, 1995.[ [12] ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.