State v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · State v. Stenson · State v. Bourgeois · State v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To convict the defendant, Anton Barker, of the crime of Robbery in the Second Degree, each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barker“(4) That force or fear was used by the defendant to obtain or retain possession of the property or to prevent or overcome resistance to the taking; and”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barker“(2) That the defendant intended to commit theft of the property;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.