103 Wash. App. 94 - State v. Lemus’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Our conclusion should not be interpreted to suggest, however, that the evidence collected by the officers could not be offered to a neutral magistrate in support of a request for a search warrant, a situation not present here, but discussed next. C. Search Incident to Arrest The issue is whether the trial court erred by denying Mr. Lemus's motion to suppress and deciding in Conclusion of Law 10 that the search of Mr. Lemus's vehicle was a valid search incident to his arrest. Conclusion of Law 10 states:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Lemus

2. “(1) No person shall turn a vehicle or move right or left upon a roadway unless and until such movement can be made with reasonable safety nor without giving an appropriate signal in the manner hereinafter provided. (2) A signal of intention to move or move right or left when required shall be given continuously during not less than the last one hundred feet traveled by the vehicle before turning.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lemus

3. “A. Officer Washburn observed the vehicle begin to move toward the inside SB lane. The turn signal was activated as the left front tire began to cross the lane divider. B. Based on his observations, Officer Washburn testified that he had probable cause to believe the driver of the vehicle had committed a violation of RCW 46.61.305.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lemus