Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Monosso

103 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Monosso’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2004

12 state decisions

60198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · Michigan v. Tyler · Jones v. United States · 76 Wis. 2d 457 - Bies v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An appellate court should review conditions of probation such as restitution to determine their validity and reasonableness as measured by how well they serve to effectuate the objectives of probation. Such objectives are rehabilitation and protection of the state and community. Huggett v. State, 83 Wis. 2d 790, 798 , 266 N.W.2d 403, 407 (1978).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A burning building clearly presents an exigency of sufficient proportions to render a warrantless entry 'reasonable.’” Id. at 509.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.