103 Wis. 2d 455 - State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · 31 Wis. 2d 110 - Lock v. State · 53 Wis. 2d 218 - Bautista v. State · 75 Wis. 2d 575 - State v. Olson · 53 Wis. 2d 751 - Champlain v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The court has held that prejudice to a defendant is presumptively erased from the jury’s collective mind when admonitory instructions have been properly given by the court.” State v. Williamson, 84 Wis. 2d 370, 391 , 267 N.W.2d 337 (1978), citing Roehl v. State, 77 Wis. 2d 398, 413 , 253 N.W.2d 210 (1977).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.