Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 ALA 331 - Yeend v. Weeks

Yeend v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
May 1972
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1972 · most notably American Surety Co. v. Marotta (1933), Manchuria S. S. Co. v. Harry G. G. Donald & Co. (1917)

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

100189319001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seals v. Robinson & Co. · Pickett v. Pipkin · Keel v. Larkin · Bibb v. Freeman · Halfman's v. Ellison & Sons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, then, there is no more proof than the judgment itself — in the absence of fraud or collusion, as we have seen — it is evidence of the existence of a debt at the time of its rendition, and only at that time. This is sufficient to entitle the judgment creditor to impeach the fraudulent conveyance as tainted with actual fraud. In such case, the burden of proving the actual fraud would be upon the complainant. If the complainant, however, would use the judgment to the prejudice of a grantee in a deed alleged to be only voluntary and constructively fraudulent, there must be independent, distinct evidence of facts showing the cause of action which authorized the rendition of the judgment, and that it is older than the conveyance.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.