Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 Ariz. 319 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2003 · most notably State v. Dessureault (1969), State v. Harvill (1970)

34 state decisions

28019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ker v. State of California · 67 Cal. 2d 365 - People v. Lara · State v. Pederson · State v. Acosta · State v. Vaughn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To be lawful a warrantless arrest must be based upon ‘probable cause’. The arresting officer must have probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed and that the person to be arrested committed it. A.R.S. § 13-1403. Probable cause exists where the arresting officers have reasonably trustworthy information of facts and circumstances which are sufficient in themselves to lead a reasonable man to believe that an offense is being or has been committed and the person to be arrested is committing or did commit it. Ker v. State of California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct. 1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 ; State v. Pederson, 102 Ariz. 60 , 424 P.2d 810 (1967) ; State v. Vaughn, 104 Ariz. 240 , 450 P.2d 698 (Feb. 20, 1969).” State v. Williams, 104 Ariz. 319, 321 , 452 P.2d 112, 114 (1969).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.