Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 ARK 459 - Swift v. Erwin

Swift v. Erwin’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
8
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Rhode v. Gallat (1915), 13 Ark. App. 266 - Moeller v. Theis Realty, Inc. (1985)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 34 state decisions

70191219201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on De Sollar v. Hanscome · Black v. Maddox · Dyer v. Duffy · Litz v. Goosling · Cazort & McGehee Co. v. Dunbar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an option is not a sale. It is not a contract by which one agrees to sell and the other to buy. It is only an offer by one to sell within a limited time and a right acquired by the other to accept or reject such offer within such time. When this privilege is exercised by acceptance, then and not until then does it become a contract of sale.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.