104 Cal. App. 369 - Wiseman v. Sklar’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2016
2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grain v. Aldrich · Rabe v. Western Union Telegraph Co. · Taboada v. Sociedad Espanola De Beneficencia Mutua · Cutting Packing Co. v. Packers' Exchange · Martin v. Howe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is therefore apparent that defendants have not been injured by the fact that performance was done by Wiseman under an assignment found by the court to be invalid... . Since (defendants) have not been injured and have what they expected to get, they cannot now be heard to complain.” ( 285 P., at 1084 )”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.