104 Cal. App. 513 - Miles v. McFarlane’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2008
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 96 Cal. App. 549 - Fornaseri v. Cosmosart Realty & Building Corp. · 99 Cal. App. 783 - Clarey v. Security Portland C. Co., Inc. · Lynch v. Keystone Consol. Mining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While the allegation of an asserted fact which is stated in the form of a conclusion may ordinarily be sufficient in the absence of a special demurrer, it is rendered inadequate, however, when the recited facts upon which it depends fail to support the conclusion. A conclusion has no greater force than the express premise upon which it is founded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lester v. Beer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.