Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 CALAPP2D 347 - Jones v. Harris

Jones v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
April 1966
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Berniker v. Berniker · 30 Cal. 2d 193 - Cope v. Davison · 23 Cal. 2d 632 - Gray v. Southern Pacific Co. · 61 Cal. App. 2d 761 - Pennix v. Winton · Parsons v. Fuller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in fact so far over on his left-hand side of the road that the car struck the reflector lights. The jury could have concluded that this may have caused him to lose control of the car, or because no other car was immediately involved that excessive speed on a curve alone could have been the factor which caused him to lose control, strike the reflectors, and then plunge over the bank to destruction. [8] Wilful misconduct, such as will render a driver liable to his guest, may manifest itself in either of the following ways:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[F]irst, `the intentional doing of something with a knowledge that serious injury is a probable (as distinguished from a possible) result'; and second, `the intentional doing of an act with a wanton and reckless disregard of its possible result.' . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.