104 Cal. App. 4th 76 - People v. Samples’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 69 Cal. 2d 491 - People v. Superior Court · 47 Cal. 2d 45 - People v. Burke · 27 Cal. 4th 49 - People v. Avery · 58 Cal. 2d 645 - People v. Sidener · 33 Cal. 3d 596 - People v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) An order setting aside all or any portion of the indictment, information, or complaint”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(10) The imposition of an unlawful sentence, whether or not the court suspends the execution of the sentence, ... As used in this paragraph, `unlawful sentence' means the imposition of a sentence not authorized by law or the imposition of a sentence based upon an unlawful order of the court which strikes or otherwise modifies the effect of an enhancement or prior conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Subdivision (d) of section 1238 prohibits the People's appeal in this case. This is so because, even though the People claim to be appealing from the underlying order determining the [prior] conviction was not a strike, not the grant of probation itself, their appeal, if sustained, would necessitate reversal of the grant of probation as well.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.