Davis v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis
104 F. 235 · 1900
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1927
3 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne Railroad · Vaccaro v. Security Bank · Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty. · Eaton v. Walker · In re Blair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is no evidence of collusion, fraud, or any other evil thing or purpose. * * * It would be an abuse of language and a confusion of ideas to hold that the passive conduct of the Vaccaros in respect to the bill seeking a receiver was a concealment or removal with intent to hinder, defraud, or delay creditors.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.