In re Troth’s Empirical Analysis
104 F. 291 · 1900
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1926
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(3) An application for a discharge * * * shall be beard and decided by the judge. But he may refer such an application or any specified issue arising thereon, to the referee to ascertain and report the facts.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.