In re Stevens’s Empirical Analysis
104 F. 325 · 1900
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 1915
most recently cited
2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Langdon & Ainsworth v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The amount advanced upon each note is the consideration of that note, and that considera) ion is by law expressly required to be stated In the proof of claim, which includes to whom, and when, it moved.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.