Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.1d 455 - Sanger v. Hibbard

Sanger v. Hibbard’s Empirical Analysis

104 F. 455 · 1900

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1956
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sims v. Everhardt · Badger v. Phinney · Chandler v. Simmons · Craig v. Van Bebber · American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. v. Dykes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is well settled that an infant has an absolute right to disaffirm and avoid his contract for the purchase of property with which to enter into trade. He can repudiate his contract to pay for property purchased for such a purpose, and the seller has no redress, unless the property purchased remains in the possession and control of the infant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.