Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.1d 561 - The New York

The New York’s Empirical Analysis

104 F. 561 · 1900

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
December 1983
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1983

16 federal appellate · 1 district ·

80190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The New York · The Chattahoochee · The Vlbert Dumois · Davis v. Mercantile Trust Co. · Hardee v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Such a stipulation stands in the place of the vessel, and its obligation is discharged by compliance with the order or decree of the court against the owner or claimant, and the liability may be enforced by a judgment thereon against both the principal and sureties at the time of rendering the decree in the original cause. The suit or controversy in this case was between the intervening owner or claimant of the New York and the libelant and others, intervening as cargo owners or cargo underwriters. To that controversy the surety upon the stipulation was not a party. Neither does the record indicate that any question arose touching the obligation of the surety company or in any way involving the terms of the stipulation bond. If any such question had been made, the surety would doubtless have a right to be heard and to take an appeal from any decree affecting its liability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is well settled that all parties against whom a joint judgment' or decree is rendered must join in proceedings for review in an appellate court, or that it must appear that those who have not joined had notice of the application for the appeal or writ of error, and refused or neglected to join therein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.