Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.1d 647 - Haley v. Kilpatrick

Haley v. Kilpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

104 F. 647 · 1900

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
July 1951
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 1951

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

90190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Charles Sibbald v. The United States · Washington Bridge Company v. William Stewart · Tyler v. Magwire · Clary v. Hoagland · Sizer v. Many

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, upon the construction of the contract supposed, this court reverses the judgment of the court below, and orders a new trial, the decision is equally conclusive as to the principles which shall govern on the retrial. It is just as final to that extent as a decision directing a particular judgment to be entered is as to the character of such judgment. The court cannot recall the case, and reverse its decision, after the remittitur is issued. It has determined the principles of law which shall govern, and, having thus determined, its jurisdiction in that respect is gone; and, if the new trial is had in accordance with its decision, no error can be alleged in the action of the court below.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““This is the second appearance of this case in this court. * * * The law of the case was settled in the opinion of the court when the case was first here. It remains tire law of the case in this court, the decree of the state court in another and different ease to the contrary notwithstanding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.