Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.1d 768 - In re Kaufmann

In re Kaufmann’s Empirical Analysis

104 F. 768 · 1900

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
July 1929
most recently cited

4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1929

4 district ·

20190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blaechinska v. Howard Mission & Home for Little Wanderers · 7 E.H. Smith 294 - In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Callister

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If so, it would enable her to acquire property by contract with him respecting her domestic services. There is a wide distinction between the power to acquire property by contract with the husband and a power to create property which shall be her own, by an agreement that she shall 'be paid for services that the law intends that she shall render gratuitously, if at all. In other words, a contract with the husband for the acquisition of property does not include a contract to convert her personal services to her husband into property.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.