In re Steuer’s Empirical Analysis
104 F. 976 · 1900
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1937
5 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · Eyster v. Gaff · White v. Ewing · Marshall v. Knox · Smith v. Mason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The pleading filed by the assignee was appropriate in form for a petition in the bankruptcy suit, hut it was equally good in substance as a bill in equity. It contained a complete statement of a cause of action cognizable in equity and a sufficient prayer for relief. There was no formal prayer Cor a subpoena, but process was issued and served. All the parties interested appeared, and presented their respective claims by answers, or answers and cross-petitions, with appropriate prayers for relief.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“as if made originally by the judge, and not simply as an affirmance of the decree of the referee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weidhorn v. Levy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.