104 F.2d 1013
Docket No. 9164.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided June 7, 1939.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1939-06-07
2 counsel of record
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1939-06-07
Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1950
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1James W. Morris, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
¶2Dana Latham, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
¶3Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.
¶5Upon motion of petitioner, consented to by respondent. Ordered petition to review herein dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly and the mandate of this court herein issued forthwith.