Crump v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
104 F.2d 36 · 1939
Citation profile
54 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1995 · most notably Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. (1982), Snyder v. Buck (1950)
54 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kiehn v. Dodge County · Robie v. Hart · Robertson v. Morganton Full Fashioned Hosiery Co. · Donaldson v. Baltimore Acceptance Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'it would we think be a harking back to formalistic rigorism of an earlier and outmoded time, as well as a travesty upon justice, to hold the extremely simple procedure required by the Rule is itself a kind of Mumbo Jumbo, and that the failure to comply formalistically with it defeats substantial rights.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Court at every stage of the proceeding must disregard any error or defect in the proceeding which does not affect the substantial rights of the parties,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.