Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.2d 439 - Traglio v. Harris

Traglio v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

104 F.2d 439 · 1939

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
June 1962
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 1962

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

701939194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hurn v. Oursler · Baltimore Co v. Phillips · Slater v. Mexican National Railroad · Cuba Railroad v. Crosby · Young v. Masci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" * * * (We) agree with the circuit court of appeals that plaintiff’s rights in suing in Arkansas for an injury sustained there did not differ from those of any married woman domiciled in that State $f $f ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The force of these statements, when so deliberately made on the precise point, may not be destroyed by calling it `dicta'. It is inconceivable that recovery would be permitted where the point urged was sound, even though the `dicta' considered it unsound.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.