Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.2d 728 - Perry v. Larson

Perry v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis

104 F.2d 728 · 1939

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
June 1987
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1987

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

40193919401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1383

Relies on Cox v. Hart · Minis v. United States · Bruer v. Woodworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But it is argued that the statute expressly allows phytotherapy, which means the use of plants to heal, and that these ’ narcotics are derived from poppy plants and cola leaves. But so are aconite and belladonna, also powerful drugs, derived from plants. Although such drugs are of plant origin, their prescription is not the phytother-apy meant, but is the use of materia medica reserved to the practitioner of medicine and denied to the naturopathic practitioner. The medical terms used in the statute in describing na-turopathy are strange to common speech, and the proviso which follows and limits them must be given controlling effect. ‘The office of a proviso, generally, is either to except something from the enacting clause, or to qualify or restrain its generality, or to exclude some possible ground of misinterpretation of it, as extending to cases not intended by the legislature to be brought within its purview.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(1) ‘Physician’ means a person authorized by law to practice medicine in this state and any other person authorized by law to treat sick and injured human beings in this state and to use, mix or otherwise prepare narcotic drugs in connection with such treatment.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “while not binding on the courts, is entitled to weight in construing the Florida statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.