Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 104 F.2d 845 - D'Allessandro v. Bechtol

D'Allessandro v. Bechtol’s Empirical Analysis

104 F.2d 845 · 1939

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1999

2 state decisions

201939194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gunning v. Cooley · Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cox · Baltimore Co v. Groeger · Gardner v. Michigan Central Railroad · Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.