United States v. Jimenez-Marmolejo’s Empirical Analysis
104 F.3d 1083 · 1996
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft (2003), Walters v. Reno (1998)
28 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Mendoza-Lopez · United States v. Proa-Tovar · United States v. Leon-Leon · Ortega Robles v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only needs to show that he has plausible grounds for relief.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the immigration judge could not have granted such a change”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“plausible grounds of relief which might have been available ... but for the deprivation of rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.