Munoz v. Rowland’s Empirical Analysis
104 F.3d 1096 · 1997
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2023
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Joseph Skilken & Co. v. City of Toledo · Honig v. Doe · Toussaint v. McCarthy · United Savings Ass'n of Texas v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Inc. · de Kaplany v. Enomoto
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.