Robert E. Blake Inc. v. Excel Environmental’s Empirical Analysis
104 F.3d 1158 · 1997
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Warren III v. City of Carlsbad · West v. United States · Keene Corporation v. United States · American Eastern Development Corp. v. Everglades Marina, Inc. · Royal Insurance Company of America v. Pier Limited Partnership
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), to repair and activate the S.S. Cape Bover which at that time was part of the United States Ready Reserve Fleet and was in storage at the Oakland Army Base. Blake, as general contractor, subcontracted Excel Environmental, Inc. (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“), 33 U.S.C. § 903 (1986). According to Blake, Section 3864 is inapplicable because the benefits were received under the LHWCA and thus there was no”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Blake's argument would be more persuasive were it not for the fact that payments were initially made under the California Workers Compensation Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.