United States v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
104 F.3d 1377 · 1997
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 954 So. 2d 968 - Ross v. State (2007), United States v. Gaviria (1997)
24 federal appellate · 6 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3041 · 18 U.S.C. § 3141 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3152 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3156 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3571 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Chambers v. Mississippi · Washington v. Texas · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that appellant was released under the statute, that he was required to appear in court, that he knew he was required to appear, that he failed to appear, and that his failure was willful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“demonstrate that, 'as a [325 U.S.App.D.C. 300] matter of reasonable probability,' possibilities of misidentification and adulteration have been eliminated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“danger that, due to 'spillover' effects, appellant might be found guilty based on evidence properly admitted only against someone else”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.